Leading Others
From Wanting to Having: The Six Steps That Turn Intentions Into Results
Wanting is a feeling. Having is a delivery event. The six-step loop that moves an intention all the way to a result you own — and the step everyone skips.
· Leading Others · 9 min read
Everyone you lead is mid-sentence in the same sentence: “I want to…” — grow into this role, fix that product line, get the team to operate without me, finally build the practice. A year later, most of them are still mid-sentence. Same want. Same person. Often, more information about the want than before.
Wanting isn’t rare. Deliberate, complete delivery is. The distance between the two isn’t grit, motivation, or visualization — it’s a loop, and the loop has exactly six steps, and almost everyone runs the same two and a half and then calls the stall bad luck.
Wanting is a feeling. Having is a delivery event — the moment a real result exists in the real world and you can point at it. This essay is the full track between the two.
The six steps
1. State it precisely
The loop opens with vocabulary. A want stated as “be more strategic” or “get better clients” isn’t an intention — it’s a mood with a noun attached. If you can’t define it, you can’t own it — and you can’t deliver what you can’t define, because delivery needs a target.
The test is ruthless and simple: could a stranger read your stated intention and know, unambiguously, when it has arrived? “Three retained clients in the mid-market tier, at twice my current rate, by end of Q2” — that’s an intention. That’s a target with edges. Most “goals” fail this test in under ten seconds, which is why they die politely, of vagueness, over months.
2. Picture the arrival
Before the work, the result needs to exist once — vividly, in the deliverer’s head. Not poster-board fantasy: a working rehearsal. What does the done thing look like in operation? Who is in the scene, what does the day hold, what are you doing differently?
This step is where motivation actually comes from — not from pushing, but from contrast: the gap between the clearly pictured result and the current state generates the pull. Skip the picture and you’re asking yourself to grind toward fog. That always fails, and the failure gets misdiagnosed as laziness. It wasn’t a work-ethic problem. It was a definition problem.
3. Plan the path at the right gradient
Now the route — but sized to the walker. A plan that asks for everything by Friday produces overwhelm, and overwhelm produces the couch, reliably, every time. A plan that asks for almost nothing produces boredom and drift. The workable plan sits at the right gradient: each step slightly beyond comfortable, none of them absurd. Your first step should be almost insultingly small — small enough that refusing it would be embarrassing.
Write the first three steps only. Long detailed plans for months you haven’t walked yet are a sophisticated form of procrastination — planning as a substitute for step one of the actual walk.
4. Prepare the conditions
Work fails in the setup more than in the doing. Before the first step: what does it need — time blocked, materials ready, one skill gap closed, one conversation had, one permission obtained? Unprepared is where false starts come from: you begin, hit the missing condition at minute nine, stall, and file the whole thing under “not yet.”
The uncomfortable version of this step is removing the real obstacles you’ve been tolerating — the calendar that has no room for the thing, the relationship that needs a boundary, the commitment that quietly cancels this one every week. Preparing conditions sometimes means renegotiating your life so the intention can physically fit in it.
5. Implement, with inspection
Doing — with the counterweight most self-starters skip: inspection. Regular, honest checks: is this step done, done properly, moving the needle, or just generating activity? The un-inspected loop drifts; drift is the natural state of all projects, and only inspection pulls against it.
The inspection cadence belongs to the step size — daily for small steps, weekly for phases. What matters is that it’s scheduled and honest. An inspection that can be skipped is a status meeting, not an inspection. And when inspection says “this isn’t working,” that’s the loop working — you adjust the gradient or the path and continue. Quitting the path and quitting the method look identical for a week and are opposite acts.
6. Receive it
The final step is the one almost nobody believes is a step: taking delivery of the result. Acknowledging, deliberately, that the thing now exists — feeling the arrival, registering the win, letting the change be real to you.
Skip this and something precise breaks: your system learns that completions don’t count, so the pull for the next one weakens. Look at people who achieve for decades and feel permanently behind: they run a five-and-a-half-step loop. Results arrive; no one takes receipt; the ledger of “what my effort produces” never updates; the wanting stays hungry because the having never registers. That person then redoubles effort instead of fixing the receipt, and calls the whole thing drive.
Delivery isn’t done when the thing exists. It’s done when the thing exists and the deliverer has received it.
Why loops fail — the honest diagnostic
Every stall maps to a skipped step, and knowing the mapping turns “I’m failing” into “I skipped step four”:
- Stalled at the start, no pull → skipped two (no pictured arrival, nothing to be pulled toward).
- Overwhelmed, avoiding → skipped three (gradient set for someone twice your current strength).
- False starts, minute-nine stalls → skipped four (a missing condition met it at minute nine).
- Busy for months, nothing moved → skipped five’s counterweight (activity, un-inspected, masquerading as progress).
- Done but strangely hollow, immediately hungry again → skipped six. The win was never received.
Find your recurring skip. Everyone has one — the step their history bends around. That skip, not your character, is your ceiling’s actual location.
The loop is the skill
One last reframe, because this is the part that changes careers: the loop is not something you run once on one goal. It’s the transferable skill. A person who has run all six steps — start to receipt, honestly, five or six times — has a repeatable capability that works on anything: a product, a practice, a team, a turnaround. That’s why coaches worth their fee coach the loop, not the goal — goals retire, loops compound.
Wanting, it turns out, is free — the cheapest thing in the world. Having costs six steps. And the only thing between your team and their stated wants is that nobody ever taught them which step they keep skipping.
This week's practice
Take one stalled want — one you've restated for over a quarter. Run all six steps on paper, in order, honestly: define it so a stranger would know when it arrived, picture the arrival in one written paragraph, plan only the first three steps at a gradient you'd actually walk, list the conditions to prepare, schedule the first inspection date, and — this is the entry point most people need — identify your recurring skipped step.
Then run the whole loop on something deliberately small this week: one result, fully delivered, all six steps, receipt taken. The point isn't the size of the thing. The point is running the machinery end-to-end once, so your system remembers what completed delivery feels like from the inside.
Foundations & further reading
The ideas here are my synthesis. The research that rhymes with them isn't new — if you want to go deeper than the essay, these are the sources I'd hand you first.
- Edwin Locke & Gary Latham, Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation (2002) — Thirty-five years of goal-setting research in one review: specific, hard goals beat vague, easy ones, if commitment and feedback are present. The science behind the middle steps.
- Gabriele Oettingen, Rethinking Positive Thinking (2014) — Mental contrasting: dreaming the goal while picturing the obstacles. Positive fantasy without contrast predicts less achievement, not more. The fix for wanting that never becomes having.
- Dan Sullivan & Benjamin Hardy, The Gap and the Gain (2021) — Measuring forward keeps you poor; measuring backward compounds what you already have. The cleanest psychology of having on the shelf.